The 17th-century Church of Santa Engrácia became Lisbon’s pantheon in the 20th century in order to honour the country’s most illustrious people. It’s located in the Almafa district of the city, an area full of tiny winding streets that go up pretty steeply up the hill. This is the fado area of the city and where I was staying during the duration of my trip here. In fact, the Pantheon was only a few minutes from where I was staying so I decided to check it out while the rain came down for another day.
The church itself is really beautiful – the dome, the marble, the space, the light – I could have stayed much longer to take it all in. Some of Portugal’s most notable personalities are here, but not really – like Vasco da Gama, Henry the Navigator, and Pedro Álvares Cabral (the “discoverer” of Brazil) – there are cenotaphs with their names on them, although they are buried elsewhere (like the Jerónimos Monastery). Other famous people, mostly writers, poets, politicians, singers, and a footballer were reinterred here. Fado singer Amália Rodrigues (1920-1999) was originally buried at Parezes cemetery, but was moved here after public demand.
Interestingly, the monuments to all of these famous people are quite simple, with just their names on the side. I guess that’s enough of a memorial when you are famous. Amalia’s tomb was the only one that had a huge flower arrangement next to it.
When visiting the Pantheon, you can go right to the top onto the terrace and have amazing views of Lisbon and the sea, if the weather cooperates. But the other floors have small galleries dedicated to the building, showing plasters of the various elements of the building, including some old gravestones that were part of the old, original church.
_________________________________
Monuments: Not many. The cenotaphs and. The 18th century organ is particularly interesting.
Grounds: The main floor has all the tombs, but the best part is going up to the choirs and terrace to get the bird’s eye view of the place. I took the stairs but there is an elevator available.
Visitors: Quite a few when I was here. I wonder if the rain had more people visiting than usual.
Notes: Bring a wide angle to get as much of the geometric patterns that you can. It’s light and airy and provides for a lot of photographic opportunities.
DETAILS
Cemetery/Site: Church of Santa Engrácia (aka the National Pantheon)
Established: Officially commissioned in 1570, but not completed until 1966. Converted to pantheon in 1916.
Notable internments/memorials: (Cenotaphs): Luís de Camões, Pedro Álvares Cabral, Afonso de Albuquerque, Nuno Álvares Pereira, Vasco da Gama and Henry the Navigator. (Tombs): several Presidents of the Republic and Presidential candidate Humberto Delgado, several writers including João de Deus, Almeida Garrett, and Sophia de Mello Breyner Andresen, fado singer Amália Rodrigues, and footballer Eusébio.
Location: Campo de Santa Clara, 1100-471 Lisboa. It’s close to Santa Apolonia station, about a 10-minute walk uphill from there.
Hours: 10:00-17:00, closed Mondays. Admission fee 4 euros.
May 26, 2018 at 06:56
I love these images, Rachelle, and it was touching to see the tomb of Amalia. I have a CD of her, and have watched a few videos. I spent some time in Lisbon, and once contributed to a talk on the Portuguese guitar at a conference in Evora. Portugal is a beautiful country.
I love the tonality of your images. Is this your Bronica? And what film did you use? Very impressive photography!
Rob
LikeLike
May 26, 2018 at 12:56
Thanks Rob! I really enjoyed my time in Portugal, I’ll definitely have to go back and spend more time there – a week was definitely not enough! I didn’t know who Amalia was before I visited, but I have listened to quite a few of her songs since then and I love listening to her – what a beautiful voice!
As for the photos, I have to admit that all of the photos on this site are taken with my lowly iPhone 5s camera and Instagram-filtered, but I try to make the photos look the way I would like to print them, although that’s not always the case depending on the light. In some places (especially anywhere indoors) the light is too low for film, so I have to shoot digitally no matter what. However, that was never the original plan – I started the site (partly) as a place to showcase my film cemetery photos, but I quickly realised that I cannot keep up with the backlog of developing, printing, and scanning, especially since I shoot so much while travelling. Plus, it’s much better to put up photos ASAP after visiting the cemeteries, because when I visit many in a short time, they start to blend together. If you look at some of the earliest posts, there are virtually no photos on them, because I really wasn’t taking any with my phone, just a few to have something to put on the blog. But over time I realised the value of taking more, so more recent posts have a lot more photos in them. In some cases the phone has saved me – when I was in Russia my TLR (Autocord) had a camera fail (one of the aperture blades fell out of alignment in the lens) and more than half of all my film photos from that trip were ruined as a result. The only photos I have left are the ones from the phone, which sucks, but that’s better than having nothing!
In any event, once I start printing more regularly, and have a bigger portfolio of cemetery prints to show, I’ll set up a separate gallery for those film photos on the site.
LikeLike
May 26, 2018 at 17:23
I’m surprised! I think I’ll sell all my cameras and buy an iPhone 5s! These look great. But yes, a dedicated film site would be great. Keep up the good work. You’ve reminded me that I once started a website dedicated to Edinburgh’s cemeteries, but went off the idea some time later. I wish I’d stuck at it!
LikeLike
May 27, 2018 at 01:30
Why not start one again? 😉 I’d love to visit Edinburgh – so many great cemeteries there to visit (and Glasgow too). One of these days I’ll make it to Scotland (have never been) – I just wish the pound wasn’t so strong against the yen though – makes it a pricey place to visit.
LikeLike
May 27, 2018 at 01:34
As for the phone…well, there are limitations. For overcast or flat light the images mostly look fine, but it’s the high contrast ones that suffer, especially in the highlights. There are a number of images that are quite ugly, tonally speaking, but there’s not much I can do about it. I suppose things might improve when I upgrade my phone – something I’ll have to do soon, since the battery is on its last legs.
LikeLike